Stonehill
W-L: (18-20) PR = 93.7061Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 920 A Boston College (17-19, 94.8) 2- 5 1003 H Syracuse L (16-17, 94.8) 2- 3 1004 H Syracuse L (16-17, 94.8) 2- 8 1011 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 1- 3 1017 H Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 3- 2 1018 H Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 2- 0 1024 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 4- 3 1031 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 1- 1 1101 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 4- 2 1107 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 4- 1 1108 A Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 0- 3 1114 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 4- 5 1114 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 1- 6 1115 A Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 2- 4 1121 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 3 1122 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 3- 0 1128 A Connecticut (29- 9, 96.9) 1- 6 1130 A Wisconsin HA (30- 6, 99.8) 2- 7 1205 A Providence (12-25, 94.0) 6- 0 1206 A Boston University (11-23, 94.4) 6- 0 102 A Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 1- 8 102 A Clarkson AC (20-11, 96.7) 0- 1 103 A Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 0- 1 109 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 4- 1 110 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 4- 3 116 A Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 4- 1 117 A Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 2- 2 123 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 2- 3 124 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 2- 1 130 A Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 0- 7 131 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 4- 2 206 A Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 1- 2 207 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 2- 5 213 A Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 1 214 A Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 3 220 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 6- 4 221 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 4- 1 227 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 3- 0 228 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 4- 3 304 A Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 1- 2
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
920 A Boston College 2- 5 -3 -2 -1.48
1003 H Syracuse 2- 3 -1 -1 -0.29
1004 H Syracuse 2- 8 -6 -1 -- -5.29
1011 A Saint Anselm 1- 3 -2 -1 -1.46
1017 H Sacred Heart 3- 2 1 1 0.29
1018 H Sacred Heart 2- 0 2 1 1.29
1024 H Saint Anselm 4- 3 1 0 0.77
1031 A LIU 1- 1 0 0 -0.23
1101 A LIU 4- 2 2 0 1.77
1107 H Assumption 4- 1 3 0 + 2.81
1108 A Assumption 0- 3 -3 -1 - -2.42
1114 H Franklin Pierce 4- 5 -1 0 -0.93
1114 H Assumption 1- 6 -5 0 -- -5.19
1115 A Franklin Pierce 2- 4 -2 -1 -1.15
1121 H Post 2- 3 -1 2 - -2.76
1122 H Post 3- 0 3 2 1.24
1128 A Connecticut 1- 6 -5 -4 -1.43
1130 A Wisconsin 2- 7 -5 -6 1.48
1205 A Providence 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 6.67
1206 A Boston University 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 7.05
102 A Princeton 1- 8 -7 -4 - -3.18
109 A Saint Anselm 4- 1 3 -1 + 3.54
110 H Saint Anselm 4- 3 1 0 0.77
116 A Sacred Heart 4- 1 3 0 + 3.06
117 A Sacred Heart 2- 2 0 0 0.06
123 H LIU 2- 3 -1 1 - -2.00
124 H LIU 2- 1 1 1 -0.00
130 A Assumption 0- 7 -7 -1 --- -6.42
131 H Assumption 4- 2 2 0 1.81
206 A Franklin Pierce 1- 2 -1 -1 -0.15
207 H Franklin Pierce 2- 5 -3 0 - -2.93
213 A Post 2- 1 1 1 0.01
214 A Post 2- 3 -1 1 -1.99
220 H Saint Anselm 6- 4 2 0 1.77
221 H Franklin Pierce 4- 1 3 0 + 3.07
227 H LIU 3- 0 3 1 2.00
228 H LIU 4- 3 1 1 -0.00
304 A Franklin Pierce 1- 2 -1 -1 -0.15
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 130 A Assumption 0- 7 -7 -1 --- -6.42 1004 H Syracuse 2- 8 -6 -1 -- -5.29 1114 H Assumption 1- 6 -5 0 -- -5.19 1108 A Assumption 0- 3 -3 -1 - -2.42 1121 H Post 2- 3 -1 2 - -2.76 102 A Princeton 1- 8 -7 -4 - -3.18 123 H LIU 2- 3 -1 1 - -2.00 207 H Franklin Pierce 2- 5 -3 0 - -2.93 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1205 A Providence 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 6.67 1206 A Boston University 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 7.05 1107 H Assumption 4- 1 3 0 + 2.81 109 A Saint Anselm 4- 1 3 -1 + 3.54 116 A Sacred Heart 4- 1 3 0 + 3.06 221 H Franklin Pierce 4- 1 3 0 + 3.07 |
Stonehill Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | Stonehill | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 3) | Stonehill | |
| Lindenwood | Lindenwood | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 2) | Lindenwood | |
| Mercyhurst | Mercyhurst | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 0) | Mercyhurst | |
| Penn State | Penn State | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Penn State | |
| RIT | RIT | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) | RIT | |
| Robert Morris | Robert Morris | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 0) | Robert Morris | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse | ||
| Brown | Brown | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 3) | Brown | |
| Clarkson | Clarkson | Clarkson | ||
| Colgate | Colgate | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 1) | Colgate | |
| Cornell | Cornell | Cornell 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Dartmouth | |
| Harvard | Harvard | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 3) | Harvard | |
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton | ||
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Quinnipiac | |
| RPI | Stonehill | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 4) | Stonehill | |
| St. Lawrence | St. Lawrence | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 2) | St. Lawrence | |
| Union | Union | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 3) | Union | |
| Yale | Yale | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Yale | |
| Boston College | Boston College | Boston College | ||
| Boston University | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| Connecticut | Connecticut | Connecticut | ||
| Holy Cross | Stonehill | Stonehill 4- 4 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Maine | Maine | insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 2- 2) | Maine | |
| Merrimack | Stonehill | Stonehill 3- 3 vs 0- 4 | ||
| New Hampshire | New Hampshire | New Hampshire 2- 1 vs 4- 3 | ||
| Northeastern | Northeastern | Northeastern 4- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Providence | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| Vermont | Vermont | insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 2- 2) | Vermont | |
| Assumption | Assumption | Assumption | ||
| Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| LIU | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| Post | Stonehill | Stonehill 5- 3 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Sacred Heart | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| Saint Anselm | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| St.Michael's | St.Michael's | St.Michael's | ||
| Bemidji State | Bemidji State | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bemidji State | |
| Minnesota | Minnesota | Minnesota 5- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Minnesota Duluth | Minnesota Duluth | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Minnesota Duluth | |
| Minnesota State | Minnesota State | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Minnesota State | |
| Ohio State | Ohio State | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Ohio State | |
| St. Cloud State | St. Cloud State | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | St. Cloud State | |
| St. Thomas | St. Thomas | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) | St. Thomas | |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin | Wisconsin |
PowerWise = 10
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 36.18
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Boston College (17-19, 94.8) 2- 5 -5.06 2.87 0.39 0.90 -2.11
0 H Syracuse (16-17, 94.8) 2- 3 -5.10 2.84 -0.39 0.90 -2.48
0 H Syracuse (16-17, 94.8) 2- 8 -5.10 2.84 -0.39 0.90 -2.48
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 1- 3 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.90 -2.56
0 H Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 3- 2 -6.52 1.41 -0.39 0.90 1.86
0 H Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 2- 0 -6.52 1.41 -0.39 0.90 1.86
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 4- 3 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.90 2.72
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 1- 1 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.90 203.43
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 4- 2 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.90 2.73
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 4- 1 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.90 2.81
0 A Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 0- 3 -6.00 1.94 0.39 0.90 -2.54
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 4- 5 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 0.90 -2.77
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 1- 6 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.90 -2.89
0 A Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 2- 4 -5.73 2.20 0.39 0.90 -2.42
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 3 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.90 -3.60
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 3- 0 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.90 1.11
0 A Connecticut (29- 9, 96.9) 1- 6 -3.01 4.92 0.39 0.90 -1.19
0 A Wisconsin (30- 6, 99.8) 2- 7 -0.10 7.83 0.39 0.90 -0.13
0 A Providence (12-25, 94.0) 6- 0 -5.91 2.02 0.39 0.90 4.35
0 A Boston Univers (11-23, 94.4) 6- 0 -5.53 2.40 0.39 0.90 5.04
0 A Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 1- 8 -2.76 5.17 0.39 0.90 -1.07
0 A Clarkson (20-11, 96.7) 0- 1 -3.21 4.72 0.39 0.90 -1.28
0 A Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 0- 1 -2.76 5.17 0.39 0.90 -1.07
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 4- 1 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.90 4.12
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 4- 3 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.90 2.72
0 A Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 4- 1 -6.52 1.41 0.39 0.90 3.25
0 A Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 2- 2 -6.52 1.41 0.39 0.90 203.43
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 2- 3 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.90 -3.25
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 2- 1 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.90 1.33
0 A Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 0- 7 -6.00 1.94 0.39 0.90 -2.54
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 4- 2 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.90 2.81
0 A Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 1- 2 -5.73 2.20 0.39 0.90 -2.42
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 2- 5 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 0.90 -2.77
0 A Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 1 -7.57 1.00 0.39 0.90 2.51
0 A Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 3 -7.57 1.00 0.39 0.90 -3.25
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 6- 4 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.90 2.72
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 4- 1 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 0.90 3.28
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 3- 0 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.90 1.33
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 4- 3 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.90 1.33
0 A Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 1- 2 -5.73 2.20 0.39 0.90 -2.42
------
409.53
|
winning pts = 47.8842 losing points = -45.2196
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------